Usually (but not always) I choose the protagonist's POV and write in a stream-of-consciousness, that is, from inside the protagonist's head (in third person). So far it worked well for me.
But yesterday something happened. Yesterday, my protagonist became incapacitated. If there are no thoughts, feelings and action coming from my protagonist/POV, what do I do next? The story has to jump to when the protagonist comes to and gets filled in the blanks of what happened when he was incapacitated.
Of course, this can work and has worked for me in the past, but in this instance I didn't feel it would be the best way to do this. Many things happen, important things, that continue the story, and telling them "later" is mitigating their importance.
Another option is to have multiple narrators and solve the problem this way. A second character's point of view can take over and tell what happened while the protagonist is incapacitated. But again, I felt that bringing a second POV this late in the novel wouldn't quite work.
Which led me back to the first thing I thought. Perhaps the novel would be better told from the protagonist's best friend's POV. Perhaps his view of things, of what happens to/with his friend (the protagonist), perhaps all these observations can give the story another dimension, one I didn't expect to have.
For now I'm going to put this aside for a couple of days and then re-evaluate. It would be quite a project to go back and change the POV, but if it would make the novel better, maybe I will.
Oh, lordy!
How much thought do you give to POV before starting a novel???
[...]
Categories: writing, character, POV, elements, process
13 comments:
Eric, thanks for this.
As I've mention in the post and you've mentioned in your comment (thank you for adding these great points), there are many different ways to go about an incapacitated protagonist. You're absolutely right.
What interested me, though, was the idea of a POV I don't usually write in. A POV that isn't the Protgonist's but someone who observes him. Like in The Great Gatsby (although not in first person). This idea just opened this whole new dimension to the story, one I haven't considered before and I was wondering how many authors use this POV. I've only read a handfull of books that I can say use this POV.
True, that's the beauty of external narrative. You don't have to change POV, but you can change the distance to your story.
The truth about POVs in my case is that, to be honest, I can never decide and be sure before starting writing the novel/story... 'Which POV is right' is something no plans or preparation ever tells me at 100%, so I guess I wouldn't be of good advice here...
Telling it from the friend's POV, though, sounds like a good idea, even without knowing the story. But then, indeed, rewriting everything would be a hassle.
Yzabel, you're probably (very) right.
For me it's become almost automatic that I start the story in the regular protagonist POV I usually take (don't fix what isn't broken, right?)
So while I think that occasionally a different POV can be more interesting, it'd probably be hard to see this before starting the novel. Unless I was a writer who plans everything (which I am not).
I hear you Eric and love all your suggestions. A few problems is that a) I don't "do" surreal :) which I'm often told is too bad, but it isn't in me. Logic and reality control my plots if not my characters. b) the other problem is the level of penetration I already have. It makes total sense what you're saying, but in my case it would equivalent to introducing a second POV half way through the novel.
You're da best - thanks Eric :)
Carter, a friend of mine wrote a novel (not published) similar in style to what you say Talyn is like.
I rarely write in first person although many have claimed that my third reads like a first (hence the problem with Eric's suggestions). But you're right, it would be a great learning experience and maybe that's the way I should look at it.
Maybe you could write some, but not all, of the chapters from the best friend's POV, so this next chapter won't look like the second POV was brough in late.
That's a fine idea Benjamin. A mighty fine idea.
Might actually work.
Thanks :)
Coming back to it in a few days will surely help you. When I started my novel, the opening scene didn't work and there was something not clicking for me with the main character. I took a break and then one day it hit. I changed the main character from a man to a woman, scraped the first scene and started the book with my new character.
I find it easier to right from the First Person POV but it didn't work for my novel. I think it would have been too confusing for the reader to write a fantasy, in an alien world from the main characters perspective.
Hiya Fred.
Changing the gender of a protagonist is no small feat.
Personally I don't like first person that much. I find it limiting, but lately it's been the trend and a few very good books have come out in first person.
I used to hate reading first person novels. Funny thing is, lately, I prefer them over most third person POVs. I like the immediacy of first person. Interesting how taste can change.
I write in either third or first depending on the story. I'm actually debating whether to sneak in some third person POV into a first person manuscript (like aforementioned Talyn). There reason being, it would allow me to show rather than tell what happened with the other characters.
It definitely is amazing how are taste changes. I used to dislike humour books and films, now I love them. (I don't prefer them, but I enjoy them).
That's usually the reason I find it difficult with the first person. Getting away from the telling. Although right now I'm reading an excellent novel that is at least equal parts telling and showing if not more telling, but it's just excellent.
Interesting problem. Deciding who the POV character will be before each scene is vital, I believe.
One problem with giving the POV to another character to narrate the protagonist's story throughout the book is that he will always stand between the reader and the progagonist. The reader will not get close enough to the protagonist to know him, and if he doesn't get to know him - well, perhaps the reader will lose interest.
Another thought - If the 'best friend' narrates the story doesn't he then become the progagonist?
Giving the best friend a POV in that particluar stage of the book that you mention might be solved by giving him occasional POV scenes earlier in the book so that the reader already knows him.
Dodo, you bring excellent points. Thanks.
I read a couple of excellent books where the POV isn't the Protagonist's - The Great Gatsby being the prime example.
It is probably harder to do but it can bring other aspects the protagonist cannot bring. So you lose some things, but win othes.
It's a dilemma for sure :)
Post a Comment